Kant on Autonomy and the Value of Persons. Barbara Herman - 2007 - Harvard University Press. Treating Persons as Ends. P. C. Lo - 1987 - University Press of America
Kant on Autonomy and the Value of Persons. A Kantian Perspective on Political Violence. Thomas E. Hill - 1997 - The Journal of Ethics 1 (2):105 - 140. The People Problem. Lo - 1987 - University Press of America. The Need for Plans, Projects and Reasoning About Ends: Kant and Williams. Salim Kemal - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (2):187 – 215. On Treating Persons as Ends in Themselves. A. Zaitchik - 1980 - Journal of Value Inquiry 14 (3-4):333-334.
Moral philosophy, for Kant, is most fundamentally addressed to the . In addition, Kant thought that moral philosophy should characterize an. .
Moral philosophy, for Kant, is most fundamentally addressed to the first-person, deliberative question, What ought I to do?, and an answer to that question requires much more than delivering or justifying the fundamental principle of morality. To this end, Kant employs his findings from the Groundwork in The Metaphysics of Morals, and offers a categorization of our basic moral duties to ourselves and others. In addition, Kant thought that moral philosophy should characterize and explain the demands that morality makes on human psychology and forms of human social interaction.
Books & Digital Media. Societies & Associations.
Free Essay: Immanuel Kant, like his predecessors John Locke and Thomas . Using Immanuel Kant 's moral philosophy, we can make an arguable debate.
Free Essay: Immanuel Kant, like his predecessors John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, believed morality was based on standards of rationality. A hypothetical imperative directs how one acts based on an end that he or she wills. In this case, the value of an action is based on how well it achieves some purpose that one may, may not or must want. Words: 899 - Pages: 4.
Thus, Kant argued that if moral philosophy is to protect against . These methods of moral philosophy are questioned time and again by Kant.
Thus, Kant argued that if moral philosophy is to protect against deterioration of the necessity of obligation in defence of moral thought, it must be carried out entirely a priori. Although these are the two fundamental aims of moral philosophy, they are not, the only aims.
A comparison of Kant with the Stoics is used to object to some recent interpretations of Kant's moral philosophy. In two chapters it is argued that Kant's views on enlightenment and on unsocial sociability are tied to his unique theory of radical evil. The book ends with a philosophical autobiography, relating to the development of moral philosophy and American philosophical institutions from 1950 to the present.
Kant’s Philosophy of How To Act In the second section of Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals . A Moral Essay As a human being and as a leader, moral philosophy is very important (Fagothey, 2000; Pojman, 2012).
Kant’s Philosophy of How To Act In the second section of Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant argues what is good will. He gives the answer to this question: good will is the one which follows the categorical imperative to act only according to that maxim which you can at the same time will that it becomes a universal law (4:421). What a leader believes from a moral and ethical standpoint is often shaped by what that leader was taught growing up. Each person has a set of morals that they learned at some point in their life.
Kant holds a key position in the history of modern philosophy as the last great figure to belong fully to both the . The second and third essays illuminatingly discuss the role reason plays in Kant's moral philosophy.
Kant holds a key position in the history of modern philosophy as the last great figure to belong fully to both the Anglo-American analytic tradition and the Continental tradition. As the world's foremost scholar of Kant and German Idealism, Dieter Henrich combines an encyclopedic knowledge of Kant's texts with an equally profound understanding of the philosophers of preceding and succeeding centuries.
Moral Philosophy According to Immanuel Kant. Kantian Ethics in a Nutshell. Another version of the Categorical Imperative that Kant offers states that one should always treat people as ends in themselves, never merely as a means to one’s own ends. This is commonly referred to as the ends principle. While similar in a way to the Golden Rule: "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you," it puts the onus for following the rule on humankind rather than accepting the strictures of divine influence. The key to Kant’s belief regarding what makes humans moral beings is the fact that we are free and rational creatures.